Results 1 to 3 of 3
-
04-09-2010, 12:10 PM #1
Unique Content Not Good Enough for SERP
I personally think Google and all other search engine SERP algorithm is flawed.
What are the two main things that effects SERP ranking most? IMO they are:
- Content
- Backlinks
I have some sites that have purely unique content written by me. But I hardly do any link building for them. And the result is they got low PR, bad SERP ranking.
On the other hand I have some sites that have unique and duplicate content both. I do heavily work on the backlinks for them. And result is I do great great PR and good SERP ranks.
So my thought is, search engines should put less weight on backlinks. This process is seriously flawed.
Whats your opinion on this
Webmaster Forum <--to the honor of webcosmoforums.com for having us this great place to hang out.
-
04-09-2010, 12:15 PM #2
- Join Date
- Apr 2008
- Location
- Boston, USA
- Posts
- 13,176
- Thanks
- 744
- Thanked 701 Times in 550 Posts
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Feedback Score
- 4 (100%)
its true that backlinks is the most important thing for serp ranking these days. thats why we have all the seo pros making money
Free Classified Ads & BUSINESS/PROFESSIONAL SOCIAL NETWORK
-
04-10-2010, 01:29 AM #3
In my own experiences, right target keywords+seo friendly title tags+enough backlinks would make any sites on top of Google these days.

Thanks,
Similar Threads
-
Our Traffic Will Show Up On Your Google Analytics!
By dan2009 in forum ServicesReplies: 2Last Post: 02-03-2011, 07:17 AM -
Get Free Unique Content and Unlimited Articles Posted
By JMkcoy in forum General MarketingReplies: 3Last Post: 04-08-2010, 06:37 AM -
The WHY of Search Engine Optimization
By himoacs in forum Search Engine OptimizationReplies: 16Last Post: 05-02-2009, 03:11 AM -
Link Building -- An Extensive Explanation of What I Have Learned
By Amirmullick3 in forum Search Engine OptimizationReplies: 18Last Post: 02-11-2009, 06:13 PM -
Get Your Blog Google Ranked in 30 Days or Less
By exelor in forum GoogleReplies: 4Last Post: 07-06-2008, 12:24 PM



Reply With Quote


